Skip to content

Conversation

@huydhn
Copy link
Contributor

@huydhn huydhn commented Feb 6, 2025

Vision has already using VS2022 in its build, so this PR will just clean up any remaining reference to VS2019

@huydhn huydhn requested review from Camyll and atalman February 6, 2025 20:12
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 6, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8901

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 4 New Failures, 1 Unrelated Failure

As of commit f96ad6f with merge base d4a1e3d (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

Copy link
Contributor

@atalman atalman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@huydhn huydhn merged commit fab1188 into pytorch:main Feb 7, 2025
62 of 67 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Hey @huydhn!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added.
The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2025
Reviewed By: scotts

Differential Revision: D77997078

fbshipit-source-id: 99b403a1b1ab2dd5636eab5dd843d5bfa43d0543
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants